Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: a systematic review.

نویسندگان

  • J Bryant
  • J Powell
چکیده

Establishing the clinical and cost effectiveness of interventions in healthcare largely depends on good quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs). One element of quality in RCTs is the recruitment of sufficient participants to test a priori hypotheses with statistical confidence and to minimise bias. However, many RCTs fail to meet their recruitment targets. One strategy to increase recruitment to trials is to pay healthcare professionals to recruit subjects either by providing financial incentives or by reimbursing excess costs incurred. Many pharmaceutical companies provide inducements but this is not common practice in publicly funded research programmes. Such programmes need to have confidence that payments are worthwhile. We did a systematic review, therefore, to synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: systematic review and qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES To review UK guidelines regarding the use of financial incentives for healthcare professionals to become involved in clinical trials, and to survey perceptions and current practice. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2006. Interviews were held with NHS healthcare professionals, research managers from the pharmaceutical industry and members of the...

متن کامل

Delving Into the Details of Evaluating Public Engagement Initiatives; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”

Initiatives to engage the public in health policy decisions have been widely endorsed and used, yet agreed upon methods for systematically evaluating the effectiveness of these initiatives remain to be developed. Dukhanin, Topazian, and DeCamp have thus developed a useful taxonomy of evaluation criteria derived from a systematic review of published evaluation tools that might serve as the basis...

متن کامل

Patient Engagement and its Evaluation Tools – Current Challenges and Future Directions; Comment on “Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization- and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”

Considering the growing recognition of the importance of patient engagement in healthcare decisions, research and delivery systems, it is important to ensure high quality and efficient patient engagement evaluation tools. In this commentary, we will first highlight the definition and importance of patient engagement. Then we discuss the psychometric properties of the patient engagement evaluati...

متن کامل

The Effectiveness of a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program for Elderly People: a Systematic Review

Introduction: Elderly population is increasing in Pakistan. Majority of people aged 50 – 64, suffer from two or more chronic conditions. Care of elderly people is sub-optimal. Healthcare system has limited resources to provide healthcare support to elderly people. Thus, there is need to empower the elderly to self-manage their health conditions. Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) i...

متن کامل

Unnecessary hospital admissions in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Unnecessary patient admission to a hospital refers to the hospitalization of a patient without clinical indications and criteria. Various factors related to the patient (e.g., age, disease severity, payment method, and admission route and time), the physician and the hospital and its facilities and diagnostic technologies affect a patient unnecessary admission in a hospital. Unneces...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • BMJ

دوره 331 7529  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005